Principal-level analytics architecture for growth-stage companies that can't afford to rebuild their data foundation twice.
Clean models. Governed metrics. Systems that scale.
I work with founders and operators at the moment when analytics stops being reporting and starts becoming infrastructure.
You're making foundational decisions now that will define how your data team operates at 10x scale.
Product, finance, and ops are running on different numbers. You need a governed metric layer before inconsistency becomes political.
AI analytics tooling only works when the underlying data layer is clean, modeled, and governed.
Most engagements begin with a short scoping conversation. The right format becomes clear quickly.
Both models provide direct access to senior judgment. The difference is execution depth.
For teams with internal execution capacity who need confident architectural decisions.
Investment: Engagements typically start at $12k/month
Hands-on design and implementation of your analytics foundation, documented and handed off cleanly.
Investment: Projects typically start at $30k
Not sure which fits? A 30-minute scoping call is enough to figure it out.
Most analytics problems trace back to undefined metrics, ungoverned transformations, or reporting drift. Work is scoped to fix the root.
Your stack, designed to scale.
Multiple teams, one KPI definition.
AI is only as good as the data layer underneath it.
Audit the stack, metrics, and reporting workflows. Identify where trust breaks.
Produce a clear architecture document and implementation plan.
Implement cleanly. Document thoroughly. Ensure it holds after the engagement ends.
Undefined metrics become boardroom arguments.
Ungoverned dbt projects become six-month rewrites.
Clean foundations accelerate everything that follows.
Share what's breaking in the stack, reporting, or decision flow. A short note is enough to see if this is the right fit.